Why should Europe care about lobby transparency?
New report: Campaigners denounce damaging impacts of corporate lobby on trade policies
16-10-2006
The Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation at the EU (ALTER-EU) and the Seattle to Brussels Network today demanded mandatory lobbying disclosure and an end to privileged access, as a new report reveals the disastrous impacts of the enormous influence of corporate lobbying on EU trade policy. The demands were made at a press conference the day before European industry interests get together with EU Commissioners for their annual back pat, this year under the slogan "Why do companies care about Europe?"
The Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and Ethics Regulation at the EU
(ALTER-EU) and the Seattle to Brussels Network today demanded mandatory
lobbying disclosure and an end to privileged access, as a new report
reveals the disastrous impacts of the enormous influence of corporate
lobbying on EU trade policy. The demands were made at a press
conference the day before European industry interests get together with
EU Commissioners for their annual back pat, this year under the slogan
"Why do companies care about Europe?"
Barbara Specht, from WIDE (Women in Development Europe), a member of
both ALTER-EU and the Seattle to Brussels Network said, "This annual
meeting between corporate lobbyists and EU Commissioners is just one
publicised example of corporate power over the EU, but is only the tip
of the iceberg. For the rest of the year, meetings between the EU and
corporate lobbyists take place beneath the surface. There is no
transparency for the public, even though it is their interests at stake
when business has too much influence."
A new report: Corporate Power over EU Trade Policy: Good for Business, Bad for the World launched today by the Seattle to Brussels Network analyses how
corporate lobbyists are able to gain excessive influence over EU trade
policy making and the negative effects of this influence on social
justice, the environment and the fight against poverty. The report
gives concrete examples focusing on different sectors of the trade
negotiations including case studies of individual corporations'
influence.
Myriam Vander Stichele, one of the report's authors, from SOMO (Centre
for Research on Multinational Corporations), part of the Seattle to
Brussels Network, said "The EU's position in world trade negotiations
shows how dangerous the domination of big business interests in policy
making can be. Corporate interests pushed the EU into aggressive
demands on market access in developing countries, even though this
would lead to increased poverty and environmental destruction in those
countries. Commissioner Mandelson has a responsibility to prevent
corporate lobbyists controlling trade policy and must use a new
approach that looks beyond cost reduction for business."
A crucial step in tackling excessive corporate influence in EU policy
making is to increase transparency in EU lobbying. However, in its
recent proposals on the European Transparency Initiative, the
Commission does not adequately address this - lobbying disclosure would
be left voluntary and optional.
Jorgo Riss, member of the ALTER-EU steering committee and Director of
Greenpeace EU Unit, said, "We will intensify our campaign to ensure
that the European Transparency Initiative delivers meaningful
transparency around lobbying. To even begin to address the problem,
detailed information must be available about who is paying how much to
whom to work on which areas of policy. These answers must be available
to the public about all lobbyists."
ALTER-EU members from across Europe gathered in Brussels on October
16-17th to plan the next steps in their campaign for mandatory
transparency for all EU lobbyists. The Commission is currently drafting
its final proposals for the European Transparency Initiative, which it
expects to present at the turn of the year.
Members of both networks will stage a protest outside the UNICE day tomorrow.
| Website: | http://www.s2bnetwork.org |
|---|












