EU responsible mineral sourcing regulation
CSO response to the council mandate agreed by Coreper on 17 December 2015
SOMO supports a civil society response to the Council mandate for the negotiations on a EU responsible mineral sourcing Regulation. The Councils mandate fails to offer an effective EU approach to fight the use of so-called conflict minerals.
Not only is the Council proposing a voluntary scheme and ignoring the vast majority of companies that place tin, tantalum, tungsten or gold (3TG) on the EU market – whether in raw forms or within products like laptops and engines. It is also significantly undermining the leading international framework previously endorsed by the EU – the OECDs Due Diligence Guidance. In doing so, the Council is watering down the very meaning of being a responsible company.
NGO Coalition Briefing Council Mandate.pdf (2046 downloads )Do you need more information?
-
Gisela ten Kate
Coordinator MVO Platform
Related content
-
-
EC’s Conflict minerals proposal must not be limited to four mineralsPosted in category:NewsPublished on: -
EU political agreement on conflict minerals risks allowing a deadly trade to continuePosted in category:NewsPublished on: -
Long but hopeful path towards legislation on conflict mineralsPosted in category:NewsPublished on: -
Responsible Mining: Conflict Minerals Published on:
Gisela ten KatePosted in category:Publication
Gisela ten Kate
