How are things with ISDS? This week at the UN in New York.
After all the demonstrations(opens in new window) and protests(opens in new window) against TTIP and ISDS almost two years ago, the streets and the media have gone quiet again. After a public outrage that brought tens of thousands to the streets, international politics has taken over the process again: the European Commission, for example, work hard on a new ISDS ‘light’. A proposal that is discussed this week at the United Nations. SOMO researcher Bart-Jaap Verbeek is in New York to follow the talks on ISDS reform.
The European proposal will be discussed in a UN UNCITRAL working group
The main point of the European proposal is a new type of court that can settle differences between companies and states, a so-called Multilateral Investment Court(opens in new window) or MIC. Although the MIC does address some of the more fundamental objections against the current system of arbitrage, the lopsided nature of ISDS remains untouched. Only corporations have rights and only states have duties.
Together with CIEL(opens in new window) , ClientEarth(opens in new window) and Transport & Environment(opens in new window) , SOMO formulated a couple of recommendations to truly reform ISDS. For example by also granting states the right to file a claim against a company. Of by denying companies the right to file a claim when they violated human or environmental rights. Or by obliging companies to address the local juridical system first, before filing an ISDS claim.
The four NGOs come with recent and concrete examples like the case of Copper Mesa Mining vs Ecuador. The corporation filed a claim after Ecuador ended its mining consession, because the company showed violent . Despite this established fact. CMMC received a compensation of $ 24 million.
Read all recommendations for reform here. Recommendations for revising ISDS
We’ve summarized a couple of older articles on ISDS and TTIP to refresh your memory:
- Same old, same old: the EU pushes ISDS 2.0
- EU trade agreement threatens human rights in Indonesia
- Rethinking Bilateral Investment Treaties – critical issues and policy choices
- Making sense of CETA
- ISDS in numbers – Impacts of investment arbitration against Latin America and the (opens in new window) Caribbean
- The hidden costs of RCEP and corporate trade deals in Asia (opens in new window)
Do you need more information?
-
Bart-Jaap Verbeek
Researcher
Partners
-
ClientEarth
-
Transport & Environment
Related news
-
The hidden human costs linked to global supply chains in ChinaPosted in category:News
Joshua RosenzweigPublished on: -
The power to extract value from the value chainPosted in category:Long read
Rodrigo FernandezPublished on: -
Powering injustice Published on:
Lydia de LeeuwPosted in category:Publication
Lydia de Leeuw
