Direct naar inhoud

Should I stay or should I go?

Exploring the role of disengagement in human rights due diligence

Geplaatst in categorie:
Publicatie
Geschreven door:
Geschreven door: Joseph Wilde-Ramsing
Geschreven door: Lydia de Leeuw
Geschreven door: Mariëtte van Huijstee
Gepubliceerd op:

The two most authoritative international normative standards for responsible business conduct – the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises – indicate that companies have a responsibility to avoid infringing on human rights.

They stipulate that companies should seek to prevent or mitigate adverse human rights impacts to which they contribute or are linked by a business relationship.

In order to meet this responsibility, companies should conduct human rights due diligence. In practice this means that companies should engage with business partners and use their leverage to prevent, mitigate and remediate adverse impacts.

However, if these efforts fail, companies are faced with the question whether, when and how to end the business relationship connecting them to the adverse impact. In these circumstances, the decision on whether or not to disengage from a problematic business relationship becomes a key consideration within the human rights due diligence process.

This adds a new degree of significance and complexity to the age-old question put so succinctly by The Clash: Should I stay or should I go?

Meer informatie nodig?

Publicatie

Geplaatst in categorie:
Publicatie
Geschreven door:
Geschreven door: Joseph Wilde-Ramsing
Geschreven door: Lydia de Leeuw
Geschreven door: Mariëtte van Huijstee
Gepubliceerd op:

Gerelateerde content

Op de hoogte blijven?

Meld je aan voor onze nieuwsbrief en blijf op de hoogte van nieuw onderzoek naar de macht van bedrijven.