Socialising losses, privatising gains
How Dutch investment treaties harm the public interest
![](https://www.somo.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/MG_6012-100x100.jpg?image-crop-positioner-ts=1689182716)
Over the past two decades a complex web of more than 3,200 investment agreements has developed globally, mostly in the form of Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs). These treaties grant investors far-reaching rights, limiting state control over transnational capital and constraining governments’ policymaking space.
A key provision in many of the investment agreements is a controversial mechanism that allows corporations to sue governments in private international arbitration tribunals outside the regular national court system. Investors’ claims through ‘investor-state dispute settlements’ (ISDS) have skyrocketed by more than 400% since the early 1990s. This paper gives a critical civil society perspective on the clear tension between BITs protections and the democratic right and duty of the state to regulate in the broader public interest.
Partners
Publication
![](https://www.somo.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/MG_6012-100x100.jpg?image-crop-positioner-ts=1689182716)
Related content
-
BITs and a WTO Investment Framework Published on:Myriam Vander StichelePosted in category:PublicationMyriam Vander Stichele
-
Dutch Bilateral Investment Treaties: A gateway to ‘treaty shopping’ by multinational corporations for investment protectionPosted in category:NewsPublished on:
-
-
Rethinking Bilateral Investment Treaties – critical issues and policy choicesPosted in category:NewsPublished on:
-
The Netherlands: European champion share buybackPosted in category:Long readRodrigo FernandezPublished on: