Corporate accountability and regulation
Corporations are responsible and should be held accountable for the impact of their business activities on people, societies and the environment. A growing number of initiatives and standards try to stimulate corporate accountability, from corporate codes of conduct and certification schemes to the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. SOMO evaluates the effectiveness of these initiatives by examining the degree to which they actually contribute to responsible corporate behaviour, corporate accountability, and access to remedy. Our conclusion – based on more than thirty years of research on corporate accountability – is that voluntary initiatives and guidelines fall short. Firm measures are needed to ensure that businesses respect human rights, labour rights, and the environment, and that victims of abuse obtain the remedy they deserve. For this reason SOMO advocates for binding enforceable regulations and laws, effective judicial and non-judicial grievance mechanisms, and a strengthened international legal framework to protect human rights in the context of business operations.
Overview of articles
-
European Parliament approval of draft Batteries Regulation is a welcome step towards just energy transitionPosted in category:Published on:Statement
-
Norway and Telenor could be held responsible under international law for human rights abuses resulting from Myanmar deal: legal expertsPosted in category:NewsJoseph Wilde-RamsingPublished on:
-
Myanmar citizen files data protection complaint against Telenor for dangerous breach of privacyPosted in category:NewsJoseph Wilde-RamsingPublished on:
-
Tread cautiously Published on:Joseph Wilde-RamsingPosted in category:PublicationJoseph Wilde-Ramsing
-
Respecting rights or ticking boxes? Published on:Joseph Wilde-RamsingPosted in category:PublicationJoseph Wilde-Ramsing
-
Good policy paper Published on:Marian IngramsPosted in category:PublicationMarian Ingrams
-
Re-cap: 2021 negotiations over binding treaty on business and human rightsPosted in category:NewsLydia de LeeuwPublished on:
-
SOMO and Both ENDS condemn violence against Indigenous community near the Barro Blanco dam in PanamaPosted in category:Published on:Statement
-
Why is the EU still absent in UN negotiations on binding human rights rules for business?Posted in category:OpinionHeidi Hautala (MEP, Greens / EFA)Heidi Hautala (MEP, Greens / EFA)
-
Apply Open Data Principles in EU legislation on corporate reportingPosted in category:Published on:Statement
-
Telenor’s exit from Myanmar – a cautionary tale for the just transitionPosted in category:OpinionAudrey GaughranAudrey Gaughran
-
Dutch government dodges parliamentary questions on SOMO’s research on corporate lobbyingPosted in category:NewsPublished on:
-
Complaint accepted against Norwegian company Telenor for its actions in MyanmarPosted in category:NewsPublished on:
-
Complaint against Telenor for irresponsible disengagement from MyanmarPosted in category:NewsJoseph Wilde-RamsingPublished on:
-
-
Interim decision on complaint against C&A leaves much to be desiredPosted in category:NewsPublished on:
-
Posted in category:Publication
-
Coal mines must close, but not without just solutions for communities and workersPosted in category:NewsPublished on: